Charlie Kirk

On September 10, one day before the commemoration of the September 11 false flag, Charlie Kirk was supposedly shot dead.

 

For weeks, this event drew the attention of people from all over the world, distracting many from geopolitical developments and the continuous genocide in Gaza. It happened in plain view on a campus tour in Phoenix, Utah and was captured by many smartphones and this made the shocking incident the central issue for the media.

 

At the memorial service, in which tens of thousands filled the stadium, the occasion was exploited to deepen the already widening rift within American society, blaming political opponents of the ruling Republican party for the murder, without a shred of evidence. When Top Trump aid Stephen Miller says to the imaginary enemy 'You have no idea the dragon you have awakened', the future is indeed very dark, realizing that the dragon is actually 'having great wrath, knowing that he has a short time' (Rev.12:12).

 

It is stunning that the death of man by a bullet is able to arouse nationwide grief of tens of millions in a country that keeps delivering the weapons and the diplomatic conditions for causing a hundredfold of terror each day in a small strip of land where 2 million people are made homeless and face complete extermination. Wasn't the dragon not already awakened then?

 

Like September 11, America seems again in turmoil because of a false flag and like in so many cases, the official narrative is way off from all eye witness accounts and from all video's of the happening from tens if not hundreds of different angles that have appeared  on the internet. One asks oneself why the rulers of this world always manage to overlay the reality with a story that is so blatantly untrue. 

 

It is also noteworthy that few commentators on the internet have pointed at the abnormal behavior of those in charge in the minutes directly before and after the shooting.

 

The video material on the Internet on the Kirk-shooting shows a strange man with brown shirt and sunglasses that first seems part of the public but later is on the team that transports Charlie to the exit. At the moment of the shooting he makes a strange move with his right arm toward his left and something of dark color seems to fly through the air, toward the place where Charlie was sitting:

Man in brown close-up from front 

In this movie one can see the brown shirt from the back, with the same strange motion of his right arm.:

Man in brown from the back, further away

This video shows him directly after the shooting, assisting the men in charge of carrying Charlie (8:40):

Man in brown assisting after shooting

This video shows him walking in front of the group that carried Charlie to a car and that stepped in on the other side, and got to sit next to Charlie in the car.

Man in brown walking in front of Charlie to the car

 

Stange are some 'rectangular forms' under the white shirt of Charlie, which could very well have something to do with the strange move of his shirt at the shooting and the handmove of the man in the brown shirt. Was this a 'squib'?

 

What kind of behavior should one expect if someone on the central stage is being hit from behind in the neck by a bullet? When searching for instructions in case of bullet strikes, one finds the following:

'Don't move someone who's been shot in the neck or back. Movement could damage the spinal cord and cause permanent paralysis.'

And:'

'Don't elevate the legs.'

And:

'Put an unconscious person in the recovery position'

 

Contrary to all medical instructions in such cases, the persons in charge immediately started to carry Charlie Kirk to the exit of the premises, hurried with him to a car while he was hanging on one side and shoved him into a car. Within a minute or so after the shooting, Charlie was already transferred to some hospital, so we are to believe. Directly afterwards, the premises were forcefully emptied of people and one hour later all kinds of police forces and military forces started pouring in.

 

Further it is very strange that the scene of the shooting was immediately restructured before any investigation could be performed.

 

Moreover, the immediate denial of Netanyahu of Israel having anything to do with it, is also stunning.

 

Finally the withholding of an autopsy report is suspicious to say the least, while the doctor performing the autopsy claimed no bullet was to be found within the body.

 

Of course some predictive programming has already been discerned. In 1998, a movie, called 'Snake Eyes' was released starring Nicolas Cage as detective, with a secretary of defense called 'Charles Kirkland' that was shot in the neck at a boxing match with champion called 'Tyler'.

 

Whatever happened, God knows everything about it. But if this was a stage event, in which Israel was to be drawn as a suspect, we should be on our guard for the reasons why all of this happened. As in the case of 9/11, the world could again be  drawn into some kind of destructive war against the ones that pose a threat to the empire.